Luka Pavlovic vs Oriol Roca Batalla Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Both Pavlovic and Batalla have displayed solid performance on their second serve percentage over the past six months. Pavlovic managed to win 51.62% of points on their second serve, while Batalla edged slightly ahead with a 52.49% win rate. This figure is highly indicative of potential outcomes when predicting the match winner in this contest.

Return game statistics further differentiate the players, with Batalla winning 48.61% of returns against opponents' second serves compared to Pavlovic's 47.12%. In first-serve return scenarios, Batalla also holds an edge, winning 33.22% of points versus Pavlovic's 30.18%. These figures offer significant insights into their potential matchup dynamics.

Analyzing under-pressure situations, Pavlovic shows a better proficiency in handling breakpoints by saving 63.95%, while Batalla is slightly behind at 61.26%. This difference becomes pivotal during intense match moments and can aid in live betting predictions.

When reviewing overall performance over the past year, Pavlovic has maintained a higher win percentage, having secured victories in 73.44% of matches (47 victories out of 64), while Batalla claimed 48.21% of his encounters (27 wins against 29 losses). This considerable disparity provides a comprehensive view of historical success rates between the players.

Surface preference is another essential factor. Both players thrive on clay, with Pavlovic achieving a 64% win rate (183 wins and 103 losses) and Batalla closely matching with a 63% success rate (506 victories out of 805 torments). Conversely, indoor hard-court surfaces pose a greater challenge, with Pavlovic achieving a 40% win rate and Batalla yet to claim a victory.

The event levels each player is accustomed to can influence their adaptability and potential match outcomes. Pavlovic's impressive 78.57% success came predominantly from Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments (33 wins and 9 losses), in contrast to Batalla's 52.17% win rate in the more competitive Challengers/ITF tournaments (24 wins to 22 losses). Considering their respective levels, Pavlovic has faced opponents ranked lower on average, at 334.81, whereas Batalla's opponents had an average rank of 254.25, indicative of the higher competitive environment he engages with.

Looking into decisive set encounters, Pavlovic holds a substantial advantage by winning 69% of deciding sets in comparison to Batalla's 29%. This statistic holds critical insight, particularly in scenarios where matches extend into closely contested decisive sets.

Lastly, considering breakpoint opportunities, Pavlovic has been more efficient recently by converting 45.35% of his chances, whereas Batalla converted 42.7%, providing a telling statistic when assessing potential match fluctuations.

Collectively, these data suggest Pavlovic stands a stronger chance to emerge victorious in the upcoming match against Batalla, considering recent performance metrics and historical data. Nevertheless, real-time dynamics such as current event performance could still present unforeseen influences on the final outcome.